actually plask yr question contained a flat-out accusation that has no grounds .
but back to the point
using ideas and working them is one thing. flat out usuing another poster is another.
ther is no reworking here, no change of context.
u can't call this peice a collage or something inspired by ap. mih=ght as sell have taken a kozik piece and changed the text and colors.
would that be ok?
is that aprorpriation?
so why is there even a debate about this?
it's quite obvious it's a flat out rip without any work or re-interpretation in it.
plask- show me the MANY books.
we've only re worked one bok cover. and that what it was a re working we drew.
not just scaning the book, addind our text an ta-da.
we take inspiration from old stuff
we don't copy or steal
thier is a diffrence
i'm familliar with thier new stuff
i still don't see this fitting
and judging from the art the bands does for themselves, i doubt they see it fitting either.
who knows maybe they like it - i don't really have acess to any of thier phome numbersto call em and ask em.
i just really think a poster artist's job is to make something that FITS.
that's numero uno.
i guess some people don't care about what the bands think but if that's case why do show posters?