actually plask yr question contained a flat-out accusation that has no grounds .
but back to the point
using ideas and working them is one thing. flat out usuing another poster is another.
ther is no reworking here, no change of context.
u can't call this peice a collage or something inspired by ap. mih=ght as sell have taken a kozik piece and changed the text and colors.
would that be ok?
is that aprorpriation?
obiously not.
so why is there even a debate about this?
it's quite obvious it's a flat out rip without any work or re-interpretation in it.
plask- show me the MANY books.
we've only re worked one bok cover. and that what it was a re working we drew.
not just scaning the book, addind our text an ta-da.
we take inspiration from old stuff
we don't copy or steal
thier is a diffrence
clip art is royalty free art work meant to be used by designers.
flat out using someone else's poster and adding yr info is NOT anywhere close to using clip art
i'm familliar with thier new stuff
i still don't see this fitting
and judging from the art the bands does for themselves, i doubt they see it fitting either.
who knows maybe they like it - i don't really have acess to any of thier phome numbersto call em and ask em.
i just really think a poster artist's job is to make something that FITS.
that's numero uno.
i guess some people don't care about what the bands think but if that's case why do show posters?