raindog - well, perhaps i did misread your post (even though you worried i was being 'foolish' in my "heavy" conversation, which doesn't exactly sound complimentary). and funkytramp - nope, nary a drop of foam (or spittle) to be found.
i'm just asking questions again. i tend to ask questions that get to the poiint. it makes clients very nervous.
perkins, what are you talking about? debating is fun and and is a way to wrest ideas out of your head. no problems there. nor, do i expect everybody to agree with me even 25% of the time. but total dismissal based on erro or even unwarrented attack is (by everyone's standards) completely disruptive and off-subject.
if jeff wants to get into the discussion, or if micheal wants to add to it, hey why not do so? why do this other thing that has nothing to do with anything being talked about. i don't understand.
does this only happen when i post? does it happen to anybody else? does it happen to frank? any answers?
so, maybe somebody out there should sit me down and explain the "game" once and for all. good cop/bad cop? is that it?