ORDER HERE!
Posters: 112265 | Bands: 101661
Designers: 8792 | Posters Awaiting Approval: 18


   
 
RSS Feeds

Forums

New Arrivals
 Welcome to GigPosters.com! 
Registration is FREE. Join the community by clicking here!
Go Back   GigPosters.com > Technique > Screenprinting

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2009, 12:19 PM
Premium Member

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9
Comments: 0
Default

thanks for the tip, given the choice i think local is usually the way to go anyway.
does anyone know what the ideal spectrum is?
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2009, 12:25 PM
Andymac's Avatar
Premium Member

Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Van Isle BC Canada
Posts: 8,663
Comments: 209
Default

330-440 nm

but most bulbs/lamps don't show those numbers unless you really dig, or they are specifically for graphic apps.
__________________
Andymac

services www.squeegeeville.com
equipment www.tmiscreenprinting.com

Todo es empezar.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2009, 01:22 PM
Premium Member

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9
Comments: 0
Default

finding 1000w bulbs locally is proving to be a huge pain, so I think I will go with a 2x500w configuration. This whole exposure unit thing is proving to be quite a hassle and I haven;t even started! If only there was a studio around here where I could just pay a fee and use their stuff...
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2009, 01:44 PM
DenisMutter's Avatar
Premium Member

 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Very Near Dayton, Ohio y'all
Posts: 7,830
Comments: 702
Default

we use 2 500 watt halogens with the safety glass removed, 36 inches to glass, exposure time +/- 10 minutes.

works like a champ.

cost: $30 and some string to hang the rig from a hot water pipe.

no, I'm not kidding.
__________________
API Local, Member 025 - Hack For Life!
http://www.fnharsh.com
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2009, 01:50 PM
Premium Member

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9
Comments: 0
Default

I've heard a lot of people using a hanging exposure setup dealie, could you go into a little bit more detail about how this setup is constructed? Pics would be great if anyone has some.

On another note I actually managed to find a printmaking center with co-op studio space available for like $12 buck an hour, which *should* be more than enough time to coat and expose like 4 or 5 screens at a time (provided Murphy's law doesn't rear its ugly head as it usually does). I think for now this is the most cost effective method and the most convenient.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2009, 03:17 PM
boatdreams's Avatar
Premium Member

 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicagoland/Montreal

$30
Default

I believe if you're going with an exposure from above, you need a piece of foam cut to fit in the squeegee side of the screen, and you lay a sheet of glass on top.

I expose from below and use a bunch of phone books to keep the film in total contact with the screen.

Another way that works really well is taping the film to the screen, putting a square of foam on the squeegee side, and putting the whole screen into a vacuum space bag. Then you suck all the air out with a shop vac and expose.
__________________
justinsantora.com
a letter of resignation

"EMILY! FOCUS! CHEESE?"
-Steve W
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2009, 10:03 PM
windflame's Avatar
Premium Member

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: nyc
Posts: 1,745
Comments: 5
Send a message via AIM to windflame
Default

Are you not at SVA anymore? The lab is $250 a semester and they provide all the TW ink, emulsion, and stuff you could ever need.
__________________
http://www.markforsman.com
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2009, 11:09 AM
Premium Member

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9
Comments: 0
Default

nope, it's a long story but basically I couldnt get registered for this semester so I'm beat for the year. The SVA lab is awesome and I would definitely do it if I still lived in the city, but I'm back home in CT now so it's not really an option.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2009, 11:34 AM
windflame's Avatar
Premium Member

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: nyc
Posts: 1,745
Comments: 5
Send a message via AIM to windflame
Default

Not sure if steve is serious about hooking this up for free, but check it out haha. Maybe a drive to chicago is in your future.

Mercury Vapour exposure unit:
__________________
http://www.markforsman.com
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 11-05-2009, 09:06 AM
strawberryluna's Avatar
Moderator

 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: corgi beach

$25
Default

hey!

my parents are in town and my stepdad and i are going home depot shopping and are going to build an expsosure unit for my studio today.

gulp.

uv uv uv 48" 48" 48"

this is what i have learned.

are you guys feeling strongly that individual housings/ballasts are smarter instead of the 2 bulb-housings?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0