![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
i took a vintage photo (60s) from an art magazine, blew it up, and used it to make a print for a printmaking class i took in school last year. although the print is alot different obviouslly, i'm still pretty sure it was illegal right?
could i use my print as clipart for a poster, or still illegal?
__________________
Nate |
|
||||
|
copyrights only last 28 years if i have my facts correct. There is an option to renew for another 28, but i think mostly things like mickey mouse do that. Anyway, you might even beable to photo copy a mag that old.
I AM NOT A LAWYER.
__________________
How to snipe ebay |
|
||||
|
the problem with answering questions like this is that if you are wrong it can really cause harm to a person trying to do the right thing. Even a lawyer would be reluctent to give advise. So hey, there is a risk, I really don't know what to say but I don't want you to take my advise. I would prefer you take my hint and go look it up on the net yourself.
__________________
How to snipe ebay |
|
||||
|
i always thought there was some ambiguous 15% alteration rule (to hold up in an actual trial)....
but who gives a fuck anyway, blame it on warhol.
__________________
The good will cry and the evil will laugh. |
|
||||
|
You're asking a good question from the wrong people.
Readjust your question.
__________________
"MUST MAINTAIN CONTROL OF THE WEAK! MUST CONTAIN THE MINDS OF THE FREE!!" - Slayer "I am about to rape your childhood" -Kozik ANTAGONIST DESIGN - Where bad people win! |
|
|||
|
well the picture was in a newer photog magazine that had a vintage photo on each page. the picture is in a gallery in new york (or was when the mag came out). i think i'll go ahead and use it.
thanks for the info guys.
__________________
Nate |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|