okay, so since i've been here i've seen a
lot of negative comments towards designers
that use computers rather than hands on
methods of creating artwork. A look at
philarts webpage shows some pretty strong
comments against computer generated art.
anyhow, the question i'm posing is:
is it the art created or is it the tools
used to create the art that make a great
i've always thought it was the
latter, but after viewing some of the
comments here, I would like to see how
some of the diehard oldschoolers would
would respond to the question.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: kraftie on 2002-05-03 10:01 ]</font>