![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
STreamline has been replaced by the autotrace tool in Freehand.. It rocks and is just as good as Streamline..
Quark is for secretaries.. No need to use it at all. Unless your like laying out a newspaper or magazine.. I use Free hand for everything, even my multipage marketing booklets for Disney I just finished. God bless Freehand |
|
||||
|
i have a vendetta against Quark. you got it right that their programmers have been sitting on their asses. stick w/ InDesign.
as for Streamline, the autotrace tool in Illustrator 8 doesn't quite cut it for me. haven't tried it on newer versions, but i trust charlie's word. at any rate, i like Streamline, and it's all over the P2P networks. and BEWARE OF THE APPLE LOAN. it bleeds you. i still have $1.5k to go on my blue/white G3 i got 3 years ago. but then, i'm po' like kenny. |
|
||||
|
Are there a lot of you using InDesign? I'm a Quark user, but I hate it -- their tech/product support is atrocious. I haven't upgraded from 4 to 5, mostly 'cause instead of fixing what's wrong with the program Quark 5 seems to have added the dubious "feature" of turning your print pages to web pages. And it's still not OSX friendly. That and a lot of pre-press places I've worked with don't even like Quark 4 because of weird trapping problems. So is InDesign any good?
|
|
||||
|
InDesign is not bad at all. It Has some cool spell checking and you can run the proggy with a book full of info in it. I like it. Quark is a turd sponge. Thank god Quark did not buy Adobe back in 1996, that would have been the coming of hell (they did actually attempt a stock buy out for majority ownership...Adobe properly flew them the finger)
|
|
|||
|
There's a special place in Hell for the inventors of Quark Xpress.
|
|
||||
|
Man - I've got to say that I'm quite surprised at the response on this topic. Go ahead and boo and hiss, but I work on the PC platform, primarily using PageMaker for page layout and I thought EVERYONE was into Quark Xpress - at least that was the impression that I've been given over the last few years.
I can't speak to the transferral of Quark documents in InDesign, but for the most part in the VERY limited tests I've done on transferring PageMaker documents to InDesign, there was an issue with type reflowing a bit, but other than that the basic layout was kept intact. As far as pre-press goes, the vendors we've been talking to have said that if the customers are using InDesign, they'll support it. At last check, there just hadn't been many people using InDesign locally though. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|