Posters: 93082 | Bands: 87007
Designers: 7434 | Posters Awaiting Approval: 12


   
 
RSS Feeds

Forums

New Arrivals
  Gigposters.com t-shirts for men and women available!
Click here
to get one now! Thanks for your support.
   Welcome to GigPosters.com! Become a Premium Member today to get the full experience - CLICK HERE for more info! 
Go Back   GigPosters.com > Technique > Digital

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-04-2002, 05:55 PM
eviltiki's Avatar
eviltiki eviltiki is offline
Premium Member

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: adobe suite
Posts: 610
Comments: 178
Send a message via AIM to eviltiki
Default InDesign or Quark Xpress? and other computer questions

Okay so I just got myself a new powerbook, because apple is silly with those loan deals. I still need to get the software *ouch* It's going to be a while before I can afford it and ideally I'd love to get both. I love Quark Xpress but I have a feeling that indesign will take over just on the basis that quark's programmers have been sitting on their ass for the past few years (come on still no carbonized version?) So the question is do you think InDesign will become the new king of page layout? At this point do you see studios switch over or will it just be a whatever your preference is issue?

What happened to adobe streamline? Is vectorizing bitmaps intergrated in Illustrator now? I know freehand did back in a way earlier version but I can't figure out how to do it in 10, any hints?

and on my lcd I get these erratic pixels that blink on and off around text with certain color schemes. white on black one of them at the moment. I think it might have to do with the memory in the graphics card, also I fiddled with the calibration of the lcd screen and it was fixed but then when the screen ran into other color combos it did it again.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-04-2002, 07:16 PM
uncle charlie's Avatar
uncle charlie uncle charlie is offline

Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: a van down by the river
Posts: 5,261
Comments: 1719
Default

STreamline has been replaced by the autotrace tool in Freehand.. It rocks and is just as good as Streamline..

Quark is for secretaries.. No need to use it at all. Unless your like laying out a newspaper or magazine.. I use Free hand for everything, even my multipage marketing booklets for Disney I just finished.

God bless Freehand
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-04-2002, 11:00 PM
Bradley W. Zimmerman's Avatar
Bradley W. Zimmerman Bradley W. Zimmerman is offline
Premium Member

 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: tucson / pittsburgh / phoenix
Posts: 504
Comments: 399
Default

i have a vendetta against Quark. you got it right that their programmers have been sitting on their asses. stick w/ InDesign.

as for Streamline, the autotrace tool in Illustrator 8 doesn't quite cut it for me. haven't tried it on newer versions, but i trust charlie's word. at any rate, i like Streamline, and it's all over the P2P networks.

and BEWARE OF THE APPLE LOAN. it bleeds you. i still have $1.5k to go on my blue/white G3 i got 3 years ago. but then, i'm po' like kenny.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-04-2002, 11:02 PM
Bradley W. Zimmerman's Avatar
Bradley W. Zimmerman Bradley W. Zimmerman is offline
Premium Member

 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: tucson / pittsburgh / phoenix
Posts: 504
Comments: 399
Default

oh wait - charlie digs freehand.

fuck you charlie. fuck you right in the ear.

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2002, 07:14 AM
rotodesign's Avatar
rotodesign rotodesign is offline

Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 646
Comments: 106
Default

Are there a lot of you using InDesign? I'm a Quark user, but I hate it -- their tech/product support is atrocious. I haven't upgraded from 4 to 5, mostly 'cause instead of fixing what's wrong with the program Quark 5 seems to have added the dubious "feature" of turning your print pages to web pages. And it's still not OSX friendly. That and a lot of pre-press places I've worked with don't even like Quark 4 because of weird trapping problems. So is InDesign any good?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2002, 07:17 AM
Finch's Avatar
Finch Finch is offline

Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Rossville, GA / Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 1,467
Comments: 1239
Default

We are just starting to look into this here where I work and InDesign does appear to have some neat features - such as in v2.0 you can layer colors in a similar manner as PhotoShop, which is pretty nifty.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2002, 07:21 AM
jasoncross's Avatar
jasoncross jasoncross is offline

Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 11,485
Comments: 3404
Send a message via ICQ to jasoncross Send a message via AIM to jasoncross Send a message via Yahoo to jasoncross
Default

InDesign is not bad at all. It Has some cool spell checking and you can run the proggy with a book full of info in it. I like it. Quark is a turd sponge. Thank god Quark did not buy Adobe back in 1996, that would have been the coming of hell (they did actually attempt a stock buy out for majority ownership...Adobe properly flew them the finger)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2002, 07:31 AM
rotodesign's Avatar
rotodesign rotodesign is offline

Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 646
Comments: 106
Default

How's cross-platform compatibility? That is, when I open an old QXP document in InDesign, will it be all screwed up? And have you had any pre-press trouble (besides them not having the program)?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2002, 07:32 AM
gooch gooch is offline

Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: baltimore, md
Posts: 262
Comments: 167
Default

There's a special place in Hell for the inventors of Quark Xpress.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2002, 07:39 AM
Finch's Avatar
Finch Finch is offline

Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Rossville, GA / Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 1,467
Comments: 1239
Default

Man - I've got to say that I'm quite surprised at the response on this topic. Go ahead and boo and hiss, but I work on the PC platform, primarily using PageMaker for page layout and I thought EVERYONE was into Quark Xpress - at least that was the impression that I've been given over the last few years.

I can't speak to the transferral of Quark documents in InDesign, but for the most part in the VERY limited tests I've done on transferring PageMaker documents to InDesign, there was an issue with type reflowing a bit, but other than that the basic layout was kept intact.

As far as pre-press goes, the vendors we've been talking to have said that if the customers are using InDesign, they'll support it. At last check, there just hadn't been many people using InDesign locally though.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0