I'm beginning to think so. Not lyrically maybe, but overall...?
I'm beginning to think so. Not lyrically maybe, but overall...?
Asshole for the People™
The Rutles are better than the Beatles
"I guarantee, the image will not be fade off and you will be pleasure it too. " - a bootlegger
We need to print a tshirt "Avoid sucker effect!"-Fabio
"fudge isn't sharp"-phoondaddy
the ruts better than the clash?
do chickens have lips?
are bears catholic?
does the pope shit in the woods?
does a one-legged duck swim in a circle?
sometimes i think donnie osmond was better than the clash. at least more honest.
The Clash were a great band, but I like "In A Rut", "S.U.S.", "It Was Cold", "Babylon's Burning" and a handful of others more than I like most Clash songs. That's just me.
Asshole for the People™
it's a real stretch.
hard to top the first Clash LP.
Now... the Adverts... That first LP SLAYS.
a 3 day attack of explosive diahrrea is bettern the Clash.
I was never all that into the Clash beyond a song here and there, I think I may have Sandinista on a cassette somewhere... my friends were into them so I heard them often but never cared to investigate too much.
Why the hate? What's the back story?
1.they suck
2. the dude sings like a beached manatee
3.art school posers in paint splattered cover-alls
4. reggea rythms
5.they suck