Gig Posters

Posters: 139855 | Bands: 124049 | Designers: 10679                 
   
       RSS Feeds

Username:   Password: 
Register      

Social Networking Activity                 



 Bands  Designers  New Arrivals  Top Lists  Forums  Buy Posters  Submit  Merch Store  Advertise  Widgets  Help

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30
  1. #1
    Premium Member
    MaximumFluoride's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    818
    Posts
    45,629
    Comments
    7151

    Default St. Damage Control Incorporated

    The new Metallica record ir so bad and getting such shitty reviews that they are now having the Producer of it, Bob Rock, explaine just WHY it sounds SO BAD!!

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Metallica Producer Speaks Out On 'St. Anger' Sound

    Source: Blabbermouth.net

    METALLICA producer Bob Rock recently spoke to MTV.com about the production on the group's new album, "St. Anger". "I wanted to do something to shake up radio and the way everything else sounds," said Rock, who helped write the music and lyrics and played basslines on the album. "To me, this album sounds like four guys in a garage getting together and writing rock songs."

    According to Rock, METALLICA achieved the primitive sound and schizophrenic vibe of "St. Anger" by combining old recording technology with cutting-edge editing software.

    "There was really no time to get amazing performances out of [METALLICA frontman] James [Hetfield]," Rock said. "We liked the raw performances. And we didn't do what everyone does and what I've been guilty of for a long time, which is tuning vocals. We just did it, boom, and that was it."

    After the basic recordings were done, METALLICA tried to add guitar solos, but Rock and the band ultimately decided to leave them all out.

    "We made a promise to ourselves that we'd only keep stuff that had integrity," Rock said. "We didn't want to make a theatrical statement by adding overdubs. If we added something and it helped the mood or what we were trying to convey, that stayed. But if it distracted from that ... then we killed it. Every time we tried to do a solo, either it dated it slightly or took away from what we were trying to accomplish in some other way. I think we wanted all the aggression to come from the band rather than one player."

    "A lot of the songs were done in William Burroughs cut-and-paste fashion," said Rock, referring to a style in which a piece of writing is cut into pieces and reassembled at random. "There are movements in moviemaking and in music where you take technology as an art and you actually abuse it. Some people use ProTools to trick and fool the listener, but we used it more as a creative tool to do something interesting and stretch boundaries.

    "Technically, you'll hear cymbals go away and you'll hear bad edits. We wanted to disregard what everybody assumes records should be and throw out all the rules. I've spent 25 years learning how to do it the so-called right way. I didn't want to do that anymore."


    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    So in a nut shell they WANTED it to sound shitty. Good job. The songs were there, but the production killed them. No solos on a Metallica record?

  2. #2
    Premium Member
    Brendan Jordan's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY, USA
    Posts
    8,768
    Comments
    1637

    Default

    Why don't they just fade away already?

  3. #3
    dustin wallace's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    oklahoma city
    Posts
    18,703
    Comments
    1533

    Default

    i've only heard one song, and it was pretty bad, so i can't say much for the album itself. on the other hand, i think it's pretty cool they were given the control to make a completely non-commercial record that sounds like poo, whether they meant to do it or not. they haven't been relevant in quite a while, so it doesn't really matter to me. give me master of puppets any day of the week, and i'll be satisfied.

  4. #4
    Premium Member
    MaximumFluoride's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    818
    Posts
    45,629
    Comments
    7151

    Default

    The sad thing is that if they had recoded and mixed this correctly it could have been held up against the older records. The songs are pretty good. Nice and fast and crunchy in the right spots. I was really hoping to get them back. They were so great.

  5. #5
    dustin wallace's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    oklahoma city
    Posts
    18,703
    Comments
    1533

    Default

    maybe the new songs will come off better live.

  6. #6
    Premium Member
    MaximumFluoride's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    818
    Posts
    45,629
    Comments
    7151

    Default

    I'll never know, cause I'll never bother to see them live.

  7. #7
    jasoncross's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    12,066
    Comments
    3415

    Default

    metalla- who?

  8. #8
    dustin wallace's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    oklahoma city
    Posts
    18,703
    Comments
    1533

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MaximumFluoride
    I'll never know, cause I'll never bother to see them live.
    well, neither will i, but there will be plenty of boots floating around.

  9. #9
    Premium Member
    ryanaugust's Avatar


    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    2,571
    Comments
    876

    Default

    How fucking stupid. I'm sure those dudes have a rehearsal space with an 8 track or something in it. Shoulda just threw together some mics and recorded it live in their space instead of paying that dumb fuck probably a solid million to make them sound like shit.

    Metal is all about the overdubs and solos and shit- trying to make everything sound as heavy and over the top as possible. No wonder Newstead left...

  10. #10
    Premium Member
    Tenebrini's Avatar


    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    11,233
    Comments
    3370

    Default

    Now having read that, I believe that the sound was intentional and they're not just trying to cover their asses by isssuing statements like these. I can appreciate the artistic merit in doing something unconventional, but I still think this album sucks. They were not successful in thier efforts and now they have to live with it.

    I'm working on my house today. Metallica is NOT in the playlist.

    I DID just listen to "Sample This" with Brian Ewing art on the cover.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •