
Originally Posted by
Andrew Doublenaut
I would say that SF edited the orginal photo enough that he shouldn't be getting sued over it. One of his big points he's trying to make in this lawsuit though is that the AP has many photographs featuring his artwork. Whether it's from cases where he was in trouble for pasting stuff up or from his gallery shows etc. So why are they allowed to take pictures of his artwork and sell them but he's not allowed to reference one of their photos for some of his artwork. It seems hypocritical.