No, not that they're out for a cash grab. Just that they have a chance of recouping their
court fees and more.
Plus, his is the most popular image and the case will be/ is in the news and sends the message.
Plenty of people and corporations have used either that exact image or variations on it,
and I doubt they asked either him or AP.
I like Shep, but I'm not defending or condemning him for this.
Whether I do or not is a moot point.
The court will decide without regard to what is discussed on GP
"I guarantee, the image will not be fade off and you will be pleasure it too. " - a bootlegger
We need to print a tshirt "Avoid sucker effect!"-Fabio
"fudge isn't sharp"-phoondaddy
Most of that makes sense. AP and many others share rights on images...what he did IS different - plus he then went around flaunting that he didn't ask, etc.
how much would it have cost him if he had paid AP for usage rights before he used it?
I mean, besides the massive publicity?
"I guarantee, the image will not be fade off and you will be pleasure it too. " - a bootlegger
We need to print a tshirt "Avoid sucker effect!"-Fabio
"fudge isn't sharp"-phoondaddy
|
|
why does goad think he drew that?
Open Photoshop > Filter > Artistic > Cut-Out > OBEY
|
|
$20.00 |
trullshit.