Jazz junkies released

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kamiblue

guybur--I'd love to reply to you--However, if I can't abide by my own rules, who will?

1. So, if you want a nice critique it's $5.
2. $10 for a not so nice one.
3. Art history lessons...$10....
4. $20 and I'll tell go on ad nauseam about all the things you missed seeing in my prints.
5. $20 ..I'll explain the difference being art vs commercial art.
6. $50..I'll help you get a date..interested Cecily Rhys? Means you won't have to learn to swing dance...
7. $5 for any type of direct reply at all..

---

Do you offer photoshop tutorials ? how much would that cost me ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kamiblue

7. $5 for any type of direct reply at all..

---

No one here believes for a second you'll stop replying for free. You're making bootleg merchandise, dude. It does not fit into the context of art history.

Thank you Steve W.--Disregard my addendum--much love..

the moment you lead off with the "good artists steal" justification bullshit, anything you said stopped having any basis in reality. you know who the only people who quote that line of thinking are? the people who can only steal other peoples ideas. plus, youre making a product. youre on kickstarter saying "this is the mass produced product i want to create, manufacture, and sell", so the whole wide world of the legality of doing so VERY MUCH comes into play.

regardless, if youre saying anything goes, and that the better artists steal, then maybe ill be the better artist, redraw your prints better taking better account of the halfassed religious triptych concept, have mitch liscense the images properly with their estates, sep them myself better, have andy print them better than whoever youve got, and then use all that money to fund your kickstarter myself.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by danieldanger

the moment you lead off with the "good artists steal" justification bullshit, anything you said stopped having any basis in reality. you know who the only people who quote that line of thinking are? the people who can only steal other peoples ideas. plus, youre making a product. youre on kickstarter saying "this is the mass produced product i want to create, manufacture, and sell", so the whole wide world of the legality of doing so VERY MUCH comes into play.

regardless, if youre saying anything goes, and that the better artists steal, then maybe ill be the better artist, redraw your prints better taking better account of the halfassed religious triptych concept, have mitch liscense the images properly with their estates, sep them myself better, have andy print them better than whoever youve got, and then use all that money to fund your kickstarter myself.

---

Now, that is an art project I could get behind, where do we send the check?

I'm only on page 15, but I'm sooo happy that old GP is back.

Hooray gp!

So all these Jazz people are heroin addicts right?

This person is utterly insufferable.

The part I like is that, while she obviously loves all this attention, she has had no increase in Kickstarter funding. Lolls are had.

Twenty bucks says when she fails to raise money (because please, like anyone would purchase those), she's going to turn this into "It was a performance piece and a social commentary about online personas and blah blah blah <vomit>"

Also: Twenty pages! Hi, old geepee friends!