This one is obviously a tour poster, but do ya see where there is room for confusion as to what is & what isn't?
The other poster didn't even have room for show info... at least this one does.
Ultimately, it would seem that either posters without dates would all have to be allowed or not. If some people's posters have been rejected for not having dates, is it fair to allow others that don't? ... what would be a set of criteria for determining if it was a tour poster of just a band poster?
And for the record, none of our posters have been rejected due to this, so I don't have any personal interest, I just thought it was a valid question on Clay's part... :-)
Besides...obviously the rules have already been established because other artists have had their work pulled for not being "gig posters". I just say keep it fair. Allow it or don't. If it's allowed then the artists that have had stuff rejected should be able to re-post their work.
ok then-by the criteria, this doesn't fit either, since it does't say 'tour' on the submission...but i think it's beautiful, i'm really glad i saw it, and i'd be disappointed if no one else was allowed to. i think tour posters should qualify, if it's understood that it's for a tour. besides, it's gonna be a show to different people, just on a bunch of different nights...and malleus is awesome.